Skip to content

GLOSSARY · BLOCKCHAIN & WEB3

BIP (Bitcoin Improvement Proposal)

A BIP is the formal route to change Bitcoin: proposed, debated and activated only by consensus. It dates from 2011 and was modelled on Python's PEP process.

WHAT IS IT? · FOR DUMMIES

A BIP is like a document where someone proposes an improvement for Bitcoin. It might be an idea to make it faster, safer or easier to use. This proposal is discussed between programmers and the community, and if everyone agrees, it can be adopted and change the way Bitcoin works.

WHAT IS IT? · PRO

BIP (Bitcoin Improvement Proposal) is a technical document with a standardized format that is used for propose improvements, changes or new features to the Bitcoin protocol. It is the formal mechanism through which developers and community members can submit ideas that affect the base code, consensus rules, interoperability standards, transaction formats, or documentation of the Bitcoin ecosystem. The BIP process was introduced by Amir Taaki in 2011, inspired by the Python proposal system (PEP), and is currently maintained in a decentralized manner by the technical community.

A BIP must be written in clear English, be technically rigorous and structured in specific sections: summary, motivation, specification, justification, and compatibility considerations. There are several types of BIPs:

  • Tracking Standards BIP (Standard Track): propose technical changes such as transaction formats, networks or protocols (for example, BIP-32 for HD wallets).
  • Informational BIPs: they document processes, guidelines or technical philosophies without forcing changes.
  • Process BIP: establish standards for how BIPs themselves or other community decisions are developed or implemented.

The process of accepting a BIP involves open discussion in public forums such as the Bitcoin-Dev mailing list, collaborative technical reviews, implementation tests and, in some cases, broad social and technical consensus before being adopted as a standard. Although an approved BIP is not mandatory, it does become the de facto reference for developers, companies and users who wish to maintain compatibility and consistency with the Bitcoin network.

01 / Key points

  • It is a technical document for proposing changes or improvements to Bitcoin
  • It follows a standard format and is reviewed by the community
  • You can propose new functions, processes or standards
  • Its approval requires technical discussion and community consensus
  • It is not mandatory, but it serves as a reference in the ecosystem

02 / Advantages

  • Open and transparent process: anyone can propose and discuss
  • Standardizes technical evolution of Bitcoin without the need for a central authority
  • Facilitates interoperability when defining how new functions should be implemented
  • Fosters decentralized innovation and the continuous development of the protocol
  • It allows you to record the history of improvements and technical decisions of the project

03 / Disadvantages

  • Slow and rigorous process, especially for critical changes
  • Requires high technical level to participate effectively
  • Doesn't guarantee automatic deployment, depends on the consensus of nodes and users
  • It can generate divisions if there is no agreement (e.g., forks due to lack of consensus)
  • Complexity for new developers who want to contribute without previous experience